{"id":15820,"date":"2013-02-28T19:36:17","date_gmt":"2013-02-28T18:36:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=15820"},"modified":"2021-09-24T19:44:32","modified_gmt":"2021-09-24T17:44:32","slug":"mathgen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2013\/02\/28\/mathgen\/","title":{"rendered":"MathGen"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\nL’inconcludenza della prima prova mi aveva fatto pensare che nessun editore avrebbe abboccato a un paper di <\/span>MathGen<\/a>. <\/span>Sbagliavo e lo confesso qui anche per aiutare “Gvdr” ad accrescere la propria produttivit\u00e0 insieme alla fama delle equazioni per contare le pecore, che \u00e8 andato a studiare in Nuova Zelanda.<\/span>
\nA studiare entrambe, stupidotti.<\/span>
\nLa prima prova viene cos\u00ec descritta da Nate Eldrege <\/span>di Cornell<\/a>, autore del programma:<\/span><\/p>\n

Il 3 agosto scorso, la\u00a0prof. Marcie Rathke<\/a> dell\u2019University of Southern North Dakota at Hoople<\/a> sottoponeva alle\u00a0Advances in Pure Mathematics<\/a>, una delle belle riviste di Scientific Research Publishing<\/a> (\u00e8 molto probabile che la vostra casella in arrivo o di spam contenga in questo momento informazioni utili sulle loro pubblicazioni!) un tour de force matematico intitolato \u00a0\u201cIndependent, Negative, Canonically Turing Arrows of Equations and Problems in Applied Formal PDE\u201d, di cui cito l\u2019intrigante abstract:
\nLet ?=A. Is it possible to extend isomorphisms? We show that D^t<\/em> is stochastically orthogonal and trivially affine. In [10], the main result was the construction of p-Cardano, compactly Erdos, Weyl functions. This could shed important light on a conjecture of Conway-d\u2019Alembert.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

In men che non si dica, cio\u00e8 il 10 agosto, il <\/span>tour de force<\/a> era accettato con la richiesta di correzioni da parte di un referee, cui la “prof. Rathke” rispondeva:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. The referee\u2019s objection is well taken; indeed, the abstract has not the slightest thing to do with the content of the paper.<\/span><\/li>\n
  2. The paper certainly does contain a plethora of mathematical notation, but it is to be hoped that readers with the appropriate background can infer its meaning (or lack thereof) from context.<\/span><\/li>\n
  3. It is indeed customary for a mathematical paper to contain a proof of its main result. This omission admittedly represents a slight flaw in the manuscript.<\/span><\/li>\n
  4. The author believes the proofs given for the referenced propositions are entirely sufficient [they read, respectively, “This is obvious” and “This is clear”]. However, she respects the referee\u2019s opinion and would consider adding a few additional details.<\/span><\/li>\n
  5. On this point the author must strenuously object. The\u00a0LATEX formatting of the manuscript is perfectly standard and in accordance with generally accepted practice. The same cannot be said of <\/span>APM\u2019s required template<\/a>, which uses Microsoft Word [!].<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Professor Rathke is pleased that the referee nevertheless recommends the paper be accepted, since clearly these minor differences of opinion in no way affect the paper\u2019s overall validity and significance.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Faute di 500 dollari e nonostante la proposta di una colletta, il tour de force restava inedito. Con le correzioni, ce l’avrebbe fatta? La <\/span>discussione<\/a> proseguiva<\/a> sul blog<\/a> di Nate Eldrege (<\/span>Advances in Pure Maths<\/em> lo <\/span>invitava pure<\/a> a sottoporre un paper) e i<\/span>l successo di MathGen rimbalzava da un blog di matematica all’altro fino a Natale. <\/span>Non ci sarebbe pi\u00f9 cascato nessuno.<\/span>
    \nIl<\/span> mese scorso invece<\/span>
    \n    Stefan Friedl<\/a> dell’universit\u00e0 di Colonia annunciava che il paper<\/a> suo e di MathGen intitolato “On the uniqueness of prime, Jacobi functors”, era stato accettato non da una rivistina predona, ma dal <\/span>Journal of Algebra and Number Theory Academia<\/a> disponibile solo su abbonamento e nel cui <\/span>comitato editoriale<\/a> siede, per es., il prof. <\/span>Facchini di Padova<\/a>.<\/span>
    \nIl giudizio del referee era conciso, ma entusiasta:<\/span><\/p>\n

    I have gone through the paper. It is a good paper. In my view the results obtained are original, new and interesting. This paper may trigger further research in the direction of work.<\/em>
    \nClarity: This paper is well-written and well-presented.<\/em>
    \nLiterature: The authors\u2019 references to the literature seem adequate.<\/em>
    \nInterest: Readers of the journal will find this paper interesting.<\/em>
    \nRecommendation: I recommend that this paper be accepted for publication in the Journal for Algebra and Number Theory Academia. <\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Il paper di Stefan Freidl non \u00e8 del tutto random, sospetto, per via di frasi come<\/span><\/p>\n

    S. Friedl\u2019s derivation of irreducible systems was a milestone in higher homological topology…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

    Priceless<\/a> indeed.<\/span><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    L’inconcludenza della prima prova mi aveva fatto pensare che nessun editore avrebbe abboccato a un paper di MathGen. Sbagliavo e lo confesso qui anche per aiutare “Gvdr” ad accrescere la propria produttivit\u00e0 insieme alla fama delle equazioni per contare le pecore, che \u00e8 andato a studiare in Nuova Zelanda. A studiare entrambe, stupidotti. La prima… Continua a leggere MathGen<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[4300,4719],"class_list":["post-15820","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bufala","category-matematica","tag-mathgen","tag-nate-eldrege","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15820","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15820"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15820\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41365,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15820\/revisions\/41365"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15820"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15820"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15820"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}