{"id":16208,"date":"2013-03-11T13:18:06","date_gmt":"2013-03-11T12:18:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=16208"},"modified":"2021-09-24T20:12:10","modified_gmt":"2021-09-24T18:12:10","slug":"etica-del-business","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2013\/03\/11\/etica-del-business\/","title":{"rendered":"Copycats"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\nFonte<\/a>
\nLa National Science Foundation sta indagando su oltre 100 casi di sospetto plagio in proposte che ha finanziato nel 2011, scrive <\/span>Jeffrey Mervis<\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n

James Kroll, head of administrative investigations within the IG’s office, tells ScienceInsider that applying plagiarism software to NSF’s entire portfolio of some 8000 awards made that year resulted in a “hit rate” of 1% to 1.5%. “My group is now swamped,” he says about his staff of six investigators.<\/em><\/p>\n

Forse migliora il <\/span>software anti-plagio<\/a>? “Coastal” <\/span>commenta<\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n

They need to crowd source this work. I’m sure there would be many people interested in helping<\/em><\/p>\n

L’idea \u00e8 venuta anche a Jeffrey Beal<\/span>l, che tenta di mantenere aggiornato l’elenco degli editori predoni e bufalari. Sommerso anche lui, ha trovato volontari<\/a> per esaminare eventuali “ricorsi in appello” di editori che si ritengono legit.<\/span><\/p>\n

Da Retraction Watch<\/a><\/em><\/strong>
\n– \u00a0vittima<\/a> di un plagio commesso da Ibrahim Noorani et al. <\/em>della Business School all’universit\u00e0 Benazir Bhutto Shaheed<\/a> e pubblicato<\/a> su Studies in Sociology of Science<\/a><\/em> dell’editore predone\u00a0CSCanada<\/a>, Brian Nosek dice:<\/p>\n

Non trovo offensivo che mi abbiano copiato, ma che lo abbiano fatto cos\u00ec male.<\/em><\/p>\n

In effetti…<\/p>\n

Dopo l’incidente<\/a> del\u00a0Journal of Business Ethics,<\/em> tocca al Journal of Academic and Business Ethics. <\/em>Sulla homepage<\/a>,\u00a0una lettera aperta<\/a> dell’editore\u00a0predone<\/a> avvisa che un articolo \u00e8 stato ritrattato.\u00a0Senza dire quale per non scoraggiare la clientela? <\/span>Jeffrey Beal<\/span>l <\/span> ha salvato<\/a> un estratto e il nome dell’autore, <\/span>Benjamin A. Neil<\/a> di <\/span>un’universit\u00e0 privata<\/a> del Maryland:<\/span><\/p>\n

Benjamin A. Neil 2nd is a graduate of Loyola University<\/a> Maryland (BA History) and California University of Pennsylvania<\/a> (MS Legal Studies\/Homeland Security). He has been a member of the Maryland State Police<\/a> since 2002 and holds the rank of Sergeant. (Link aggiunti)<\/em>. <\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Sperava di diventare First Sergeant o tenured?<\/span><\/p>\n

Sempre da Beall, ho trovato un <\/span>rapporto<\/a> su come l’editore <\/span>DRUNPP<\/a> di Sarajevo gonfia il numero delle citazioni. Potrebbe interessare certi <\/span>dilettanti<\/a> che sanno solo auto-citarsi. <\/span><\/p>\n

Per parlar d’altro<\/strong><\/p>\n

Su PLoS One<\/em>, Abdullah Nurul-Fadhilah,\u00a0Pey Sze Teo,\u00a0Inge Huybrechts e Leng Huat Foo scrivono<\/a>:<\/p>\n

breakfast skipping may increase the risk of excessive body adiposity and as a result, may contribute to the risk of obesity and related metabolic consequences. Therefore, daily breakfast consumption with healthy food choices should be encouraged among children and adolescents in order to prevent excessive body weight gain during their critical years of growth.<\/em><\/p>\n

Anecdote isn’t data: da grandi saltare la prima colazione mette di cattivo umore.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Fonte La National Science Foundation sta indagando su oltre 100 casi di sospetto plagio in proposte che ha finanziato nel 2011, scrive Jeffrey Mervis: James Kroll, head of administrative investigations within the IG’s office, tells ScienceInsider that applying plagiarism software to NSF’s entire portfolio of some 8000 awards made that year resulted in a “hit… Continua a leggere Copycats<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[692,2147,2434,4535],"class_list":["post-16208","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bufala","category-sanita","tag-auto-citazioni","tag-editoria-predona","tag-etica","tag-misconduct","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16208","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16208"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16208\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41385,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16208\/revisions\/41385"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16208"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16208"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16208"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}