{"id":18479,"date":"2013-07-11T18:38:06","date_gmt":"2013-07-11T16:38:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=18479"},"modified":"2021-09-26T15:34:30","modified_gmt":"2021-09-26T13:34:30","slug":"querela","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2013\/07\/11\/querela\/","title":{"rendered":"Querela"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Gi\u00e0 m&#8217;immagino i true believers sperare che un loro protetto mi &#8220;faccia giustizia&#8221;, invece Davide Vannoni annuncia che<a href=\"http:\/\/www.tgcom24.mediaset.it\/cronaca\/articoli\/1105583\/stamina-vannoni-querela-nature-.shtml\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> <strong>querela<\/strong><\/a> <em>Nature<\/em> anche per il\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/trial-and-error-1.13346\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">primo<strong> editoriale<\/strong><\/a> di oggi, dal titolo &#8220;Trial and error&#8221; che quasi fa rima con &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/smoke-and-mirrors-1.12805\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Smoke and Mirrors<\/strong><\/a>&#8221; di tre mesi fa:<\/p>\n<p><em>The Italian government is planning to oversee a clinical trial of a controversial stem-cell therapy. There are many reasons for the trial to be stopped \u2014 and no good reason for it to be carried out.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Lui ci vede un intervento<\/p>\n<p><em>a gamba tesa, con la medesima superficialit\u00e0 e partigianeria dimostrata negli articoli precedenti<\/em><\/p>\n<p>perch\u00e9 non conosce quelli dell&#8217;uff. legale del gruppo. (Don&#8217;t worry, Deep Blue, gli \u00e8 gi\u00e0 arrivata la<strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/22passi.blogspot.it\/2013\/07\/sul-caso-stamina-autore-bertoldo.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">sfiga passerina<\/a><\/strong>.)<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8211; <\/em>Il<strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/doifinder\/10.1038\/499125b\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">secondo<\/a><\/strong> editoriale \u00e8 su un tema affine. Le vecchie regole del DFG (l&#8217;equivalente tedesco della National Science Foundation) su come le universit\u00e0 devono procedere in casi di non integrit\u00e0 scientifica sono state aggiornate:<\/p>\n<p><em>Its latest recommendations now emphasize the value of a whistle-blower, and the importance of protecting him or her at all costs. It warns against breaking the confidentiality of an ongoing investigation by going public with names. It explicitly notes that all accusations must be made \u2018in good faith\u2019, stating that \u2018bad-faith\u2019 accusations may also be considered a form of scientific misconduct, and that anonymous complaints may not be followed up.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Per\u00f2<br \/>\n<em>this time the DFG has formulated its recommendations surprisingly poorly. The consequences of breaking confidentiality, or of being charged with accusing in bad faith, are left open, prompting conspiracy theorists to fill the blogosphere with wild charges that the DFG is gagging the scientific community.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&#8211; il terzo editoriale <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/headline-message-1.13348\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>riguarda<\/strong><\/a> i cronisti della ricerca, in congresso la settimana scorsa a Helsinki.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/climate-change-the-forecast-for-2018-is-cloudy-with-record-heat-1.13344\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Jeff Tollefson<\/a><\/strong> indaga sui modelli climatici a breve termine, Gavin Schmidt resta scettico sulle loro capacit\u00e0 predittive, Kevin Trenberth un po&#8217; meno. Dice che<\/p>\n<p><em>it could be a decade or more before this research really begins to pay off in terms of predictive power, and even then climate scientists will be limited in what they can say about the future. But many people might welcome hints about what&#8217;s to come. \u201cFor a farmer in Illinois,\u201d Trenberth says, \u201cany indications about what to expect could turn out rather valuable.\u201d<\/em><br \/>\n&#8211; un paper da copertina meritata, sui <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v499\/n7457\/full\/nature12212.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>fagi<\/strong> <\/a>della flora intestinale;<br \/>\n&#8211; Marco Steinacher e altri svizzeri\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v499\/n7457\/full\/nature12269.html#affil-auth\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>trovano<\/strong><\/a> che sia sbagliato fissarsi sul limite di +2\u00b0C del risc glob:<\/p>\n<p><em>Such a global temperature target, however, is not sufficient to control many other quantities, such as transient sea level rise, ocean acidification and net primary production on land. Here, using an Earth system model of intermediate complexity (EMIC) in an observation-informed Bayesian approach, we show that allowable carbon emissions are substantially reduced when multiple climate targets are set.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Con bei margini d&#8217;incertezza, d&#8217;altronde sono quelli \u00a0di<br \/>\n<em> physical and carbon cycle model parameters, radiative efficiencies, climate sensitivity and carbon cycle feedbacks <\/em>(etc.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">*<\/p>\n<p><strong>Inevitabile<\/strong><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.esa.int\/Highlights\/Luca_Skywalker\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">&#8220;<strong>Luca Skywalker<\/strong>&#8220;<\/a>&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gi\u00e0 m&#8217;immagino i true believers sperare che un loro protetto mi &#8220;faccia giustizia&#8221;, invece Davide Vannoni annuncia che querela Nature anche per il\u00a0primo editoriale di oggi, dal titolo &#8220;Trial and error&#8221; che quasi fa rima con &#8220;Smoke and Mirrors&#8221; di tre mesi fa: The Italian government is planning to oversee a clinical trial of a&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2013\/07\/11\/querela\/\">Continua a leggere <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Querela<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,10],"tags":[1844,4535,4563,4725,6487],"class_list":["post-18479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-biologia","category-clima","tag-davide-vannoni","tag-misconduct","tag-modelli","tag-nature","tag-stamina","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18479"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41644,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18479\/revisions\/41644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}