{"id":18514,"date":"2013-07-12T15:45:10","date_gmt":"2013-07-12T13:45:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=18514"},"modified":"2021-09-26T15:43:25","modified_gmt":"2021-09-26T13:43:25","slug":"vai-anatra","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2013\/07\/12\/vai-anatra\/","title":{"rendered":"Vai, anatra"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ieri, Federico A. mi segnalava l&#8217;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.corriere.it\/ambiente\/13_luglio_11\/google-negazionisti-climatici_90482da0-ea26-11e2-8099-3729074bd3db.shtml\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>articolo<\/strong><\/a> del <em>Corriere<\/em> su Google che <a href=\"http:\/\/politicalpartytime.org\/party\/34741\/\">sfama<\/a> il repubblicano Jim &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/duckduckgo.com\/?q=james+inhofe+climate+change+biggest+hoax\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Climate change is the greatest hoax<\/strong><\/a>&#8221; Inhofe.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/s3.forecastthefacts.org\/images\/google_inhofe_small.png\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/act.forecastthefacts.org\/sign\/google_stop_funding_inhofe\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Fonte<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ne parlavo con <a href=\"http:\/\/thinkprogress.org\/climate\/2013\/07\/05\/2257691\/is-google-funding-climate-science-denial-jim-inhofe-fundraiser-planned-for-july-11\/\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>amici americani<\/strong><\/a>, dicevano che\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/2013\/03\/29\/when_google_lost_its_cool\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>google lost its cool months ago<\/strong><\/a>, i suoi occhiali sapevano di La CIA ti spia. Hai visto che zerbino con la NSA? Sfama anche il <a href=\"https:\/\/duckduckgo.com\/?q=CEI+sourcewatch\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>CEI<\/strong><\/a> e la <a href=\"https:\/\/duckduckgo.com\/?q=US+Chamber+of+Commerce+climate+change+lawsuit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Camera di Commercio<\/strong><\/a> che vogliono processare per tradimento del capitalismo Usa i climatologi denunciati al Senato da un maccart-omofobo-creazionista pagato da <a href=\"http:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/wiki\/index.php\/Jim_Inhofe\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>BigOil &amp; Weapons<\/strong><\/a> che si chiamava&#8230; <a href=\"https:\/\/duckduckgo.com\/?q=james+inhofe+Senate+criminal+investigation+climate+scientists\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>si chiamava<\/strong><\/a>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/duckduckgo.com\/?q=google+don%27t+be+evil\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Don&#8217;t be evil<\/strong><\/a> \u00e8 uno slogan carino, quasi vien da crederci. S\u00ec, come a\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/environment\/blog\/2011\/jul\/28\/oil-tar-sands-canada-ethical\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ethical oil<\/a> e <a href=\"http:\/\/prwatch.org\/node\/9038\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">beyond petroleum<\/a>. Ma la piccola Google \u00e8 <a href=\"https:\/\/duckduckgo.com\/?q=google+investigation+US+authorities\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>perseguitata<\/strong><\/a> dal governo federale cui il CEI, la CamCom e i repubblicani vogliono togliere poteri e fondi, cos\u00ec smette di turbare il business dei Grandi Inquinatori. I nemici dei suoi nemici ecc. e l&#8217;innocente fa bene a<a href=\"http:\/\/reporting.sunlightfoundation.com\/2013\/google-under-fire-inhofe-lunch\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong> comprarsene<\/strong><\/a> un po&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">No? Allora perch\u00e9 non glielo facciamo notare usando\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/duckduckgo.com\/?q=google+inhofe\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">duckduckgo<\/a> <\/strong>per qualche giorno?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">*<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Lato positivo<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Su <em>PLoS One<\/em>, i soliti Casadevall &amp; Fang pi\u00f9 Grant Steen,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.plosone.org\/article\/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068397\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>si chiedono<\/strong><\/a> &#8220;<span style=\"text-decoration: line-through;\">Why can&#8217;t Guid<\/span>&#8230; Why has the number of scientific retractions increased?&#8221; La risposta si capisce dalle figure (il calo recente \u00e8 dovuto al lag time tra pubblicazione e ritrattazione):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>The rate of publication has increased, with a concomitant increase in the rate of retraction (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.plosone.org\/article\/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068397#pone-0068397-g001\">Fig. 1<\/a>).<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Editors are retracting articles significantly faster now than in the past (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.plosone.org\/article\/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068397#pone-0068397-g002\">Fig. 2<\/a>).<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The reasons for retraction have expanded to include plagiarism and duplicate publication.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Journals are reaching further back in time to retract flawed work.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>There has been an increase in the number and proportion of retractions by authors with a single retraction (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.plosone.org\/article\/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068397#pone-0068397-g003\">Fig. 3<\/a>).<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Discovery of fraud by an author prompts reevaluation of an author\u2019s entire body of work.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Greater scrutiny of high-profile publications has had a modest impact on retractions (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.plosone.org\/article\/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068397#pone-0068397-t001\">Table 1<\/a>).<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-style: italic;\"> The recent spike in retractions thus appears to be a consequence of changes both in institutional policy and in the behavior of individual authors.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Senza contare che \u00e8 migliorato il software anti -frode.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">*<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Open Peer Review<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In ottobre <a href=\"http:\/\/www.openscholar.org.uk\/our-mission\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Open Scholar<\/strong><\/a> attiver\u00e0 la piattaforma <a href=\"http:\/\/www.openscholar.org.uk\/open-peer-review\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Libre<\/strong><\/a> per revisioni pubbliche &#8220;guidate dagli autori&#8221;, perch\u00e9:<\/p>\n<p><em>It is time to challenge the idea that scientific peer review can only be arranged and handled by journal editors. We propose a research assessment process complementary to journal-handled peer review where authors themselves can invite experts to openly evaluate their work.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Come:<br \/>\n<em>The\u00a0<a title=\"Open Peer Review Protocol\" href=\"http:\/\/www.openscholar.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/07\/OPR-protocol.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open Peer Review Protocol<\/a> describes in detail the requirements for implementing author-guided open peer review. The key features are:<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Authors invite\u00a0expert peers to formally evaluate their work.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Reviewers who accept submit a detailed\u00a0qualitative and quantitative assessment\u00a0of the work.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>The\u00a0reviewer\u2019s name\u00a0and any\u00a0conflict of interest\u00a0are\u00a0publicly disclosed.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Reviews are published with a\u00a0creative commons license\u00a0(or similar) and become publicly available along with the original work.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Reviews are \u00a0subject to\u00a0commentary\u00a0and\u00a0evaluation by the entire community.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Author-guided open peer review can be implemented at any stage of an article\u2019s lifetime: a)before journal submission, (b)\u00a0during journal peer review\u00a0(in agreement with the journal\u2019s editor), and (c)\u00a0after journal publication.<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Good luck.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ieri, Federico A. mi segnalava l&#8217;articolo del Corriere su Google che sfama il repubblicano Jim &#8220;Climate change is the greatest hoax&#8221; Inhofe. Fonte. Ne parlavo con amici americani, dicevano che\u00a0google lost its cool months ago, i suoi occhiali sapevano di La CIA ti spia. Hai visto che zerbino con la NSA? Sfama anche il CEI&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2013\/07\/12\/vai-anatra\/\">Continua a leggere <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Vai, anatra<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,11],"tags":[1685,1893,3146,3733,4992,5023,5959],"class_list":["post-18514","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-clima","category-cronaca","tag-creazionismo","tag-denialism","tag-google","tag-jim-inhofe","tag-omofobia","tag-open-peer-review","tag-ritrattazioni","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18514","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18514"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18514\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41650,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18514\/revisions\/41650"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18514"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18514"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18514"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}