{"id":26310,"date":"2014-10-16T23:47:02","date_gmt":"2014-10-16T21:47:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=26310"},"modified":"2021-10-10T18:11:39","modified_gmt":"2021-10-10T16:11:39","slug":"mr-rossi-i-admire-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2014\/10\/16\/mr-rossi-i-admire-you\/","title":{"rendered":""Mr. Rossi, I admire you!""},"content":{"rendered":"

Lo scrive Stephan Pomp<\/a>:<\/span><\/p>\n

Yes, I do! You have accomplished something quite remarkable. For many years now you have presented various versions of “the” E-Cat and argued along different and contradictory lines. But none of this bothers your followers.<\/em><\/p>\n

\n
Nel resto, niente fatti nuovi se seguite la comica dal 2011, a parte il rigirare the Sword nella piaga del povero signor Rossi che s’affanna a rispondere alle domande girategli dai “professori”, incapaci di spiegare un testo che avrebbero scritto insieme:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Your statement about the 2011 sample simply is an after-the-fact construction desperately trying to save you from the mistake of going from one extreme (no isotopic change in Ni and Cu but claims of nuclear reaction) to another, contradictory extreme (complete isotopic change in nickel to consist of only Ni-62<\/a>\u00a0without any (!) other of the well-known nuclear reactions and without inducing any radioactivity).[3,4,5]<\/sup>\u00a0<\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Stephan se gondole pure lui
\n\"\"
\nAnd the funny and very interesting thing is that this desperate try<\/del>\u00a0attempt to justify and explain away all contradictions seems to work with your followers! They accept your claim that you need to do all this to protect your “patent”. And you simply make good use of the fact that\u00a0people want to believe in miracles.\u00a0So you get away with it.\u00a0Again.<\/a>\u00a0Well played! This is pure genius and I admire you!<\/em>
\nWarm regards,<\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Stephan P. cita un paio di \u00a0fuochi amici, tra cui l’agiografia di Mats Lewan, e in una nota conferma quello che mi hanno detto altre fonti:<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
[3] It should be pointed out here that I have full confidence in the different analyses of the isotopic compositions etc of the “fuel” and the “ash” that have been performed by various labs. These analyses were\u00a0really\u00a0independent!\u00a0<\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Per forza, si concludono entrambe<\/a> con la stessa frase, nel “fuel” c’erano<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
concentrazioni piuttosto elevate di Carbonio, Calcio, Cloro, Ferro, Magnesio e Manganese, che non si trovano\u00a0nelle\u00a0ceneri.<\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Alain Co – promotore della “truffa della Defkalion” – si precipita da Stephan P. \u00a0a difendere Rossi da vero credente:<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
this entrepreneur have manipulated scientists to hide his IP… won’t you be paranoid if you have such a technology, not ready for market yet? that is business… \u00a0<\/em><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
This entrepreneur’s business is real estate in Miami Beach.<\/div>\n
***<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Altre domande per gli autori:<\/p>\n