{"id":26577,"date":"2014-11-20T10:36:16","date_gmt":"2014-11-20T09:36:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=26577"},"modified":"2021-10-10T20:14:58","modified_gmt":"2021-10-10T18:14:58","slug":"il-conto-della-spesa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2014\/11\/20\/il-conto-della-spesa\/","title":{"rendered":"Il conto della spesa"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\n(Fonte<\/a><\/strong>)
\nOggi a Berlino c’\u00e8 la riunione per il Green Climate Fund<\/a>, e per dare un’idea della “decarbonizzazione” necessaria l’UNEP ha pubblicato The Emissions Gap Report 2014:<\/a><\/p>\n

The fact that global emissions will continue to be \u00a0larger than zero in the immediate future means \u00a0that at some point we will exhaust the carbon dioxide emissions budget and annual net emissions will have to drop to zero to avoid exceeding the budget. If we do exceed the budget, then negative \u00a0\u00a0emissions will be required to stay within the 2 \u00b0C limit<\/em>
\nthe IPCC estimated a total carbon dioxide budget\u00a0of about 3 670 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide (Gt\u00a0CO2) for a likely chance of staying within the 2\u00a0\u00b0C limit. Since emissions began rapidly growing\u00a0in the late 19th century, the world has already\u00a0emitted around 1 900 Gt CO2 and so has used\u00a0up a large part of this budget. Moreover, human\u00a0activities also result in emissions of a variety of\u00a0other substances that have an impact on global\u00a0warming and these substances also reduce the\u00a0total available budget to about 2\u00a0900 Gt CO2. <\/em>
\nThis leaves less than about 1 000 Gt CO2 \u00a0to \u201cspend\u201d in the future.<\/em><\/p>\n

aggiorn. 21\/10<\/strong>
\nil vertice di Berlino non \u00e8 andato male: trenta paesi ricchi – l’Australia che esporta carbone no, il Canada che esporta petrolio estratto dalle sabbie bituminose un giorno forse – si sono impegnati a versare $9,3 miliardi <\/a><\/strong>nel Green Climate Fund che contava di raccoglierne 10.<\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

O’s digest,\u00a0Nature<\/em>:<\/strong>
\n– in tema con l’Emissions Gap, due ricerche sulla “rivoluzione verde” che ha modificato il ciclo stagionale del carbonio<\/a>, aumentando la produttivit\u00e0 dei terreni coltivabili<\/a>;
\n–\u00a0Save the museums<\/a>, un editoriale di Alison Abbott sugli sforzi dei curatori nei musei italiani di storia naturale per salvare le collezioni<\/p>\n

In 2004, Italy legally recognized the value of its scientific heritage and placed it under the control of the ministry of culture, alongside objects of art. But that ministry lacked the scientific experts who might have established a meaningful protective organization.<\/em>
\nResponsibility for scientific heritage would be better embedded in the ministry for science. Ideally, small museums would organize into a network, grouped according to scientific field rather than location. This network would be headed by a few ministry officials who would make sure that resources and academic expertise are shared appropriately.<\/em>
\nItalian museologists should unite to push for such a structure, which would cost next to nothing but be highly effective. They need to move quickly, and to argue with a single voice. As their colleagues in Germany have shown, the rot can be stopped.<\/em><\/p>\n

– Anche negli Stati Uniti, potrebbe diventare obbligatorio pubblicare i risultati negativi degli esperimenti clinici, scrive Sara Reardon\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

One proposal would require companies seeking the FDA\u2019s approval of a new drug or therapy to post all clinical-trial results to the government website ClinicalTrials.gov, even if the treatment being tested is never approved; current law mandates this only for drugs that are approved. Companies and researchers that do not comply with the deadlines set out in the proposal could face fines of US$10,000 per day.<\/em>
\nThe second proposal would require that any NIH-funded research on interventions, not just drugs, be registered and reported on ClinicalTrials.gov. The rule would apply to surgical techniques and behavioural interventions such as anti-smoking programmes.<\/em>
\nAnd for the first time, federally funded researchers will be required to post the results of their phase I clinical trials. Noncompliant institutions could have their NIH funding withdrawn.<\/em><\/p>\n

– Sanjay Kumar <\/a>parla con scienziati indiani uno po’ sconcertati di ritrovarsi con un
\nMinistry for Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy (AYUSH)<\/em><\/p>\n

Avrei visto bene Cirocco Dunlap che fa ricerca sui “benefici miracolosi dell’olio di cocco<\/a><\/strong>“.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(Fonte) Oggi a Berlino c’\u00e8 la riunione per il Green Climate Fund, e per dare un’idea della “decarbonizzazione” necessaria l’UNEP ha pubblicato The Emissions Gap Report 2014: The fact that global emissions will continue to be \u00a0larger than zero in the immediate future means \u00a0that at some point we will exhaust the carbon dioxide emissions… Continua a leggere Il conto della spesa<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,11],"tags":[214,819,2271,4725,5951],"class_list":["post-26577","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-clima","category-cronaca","tag-agricoltura","tag-big-pharma","tag-emissions-gap-report-2014","tag-nature","tag-risultati-negativi","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26577","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26577"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26577\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42724,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26577\/revisions\/42724"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26577"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26577"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26577"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}