{"id":28560,"date":"2015-09-07T14:58:17","date_gmt":"2015-09-07T12:58:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=28560"},"modified":"2021-11-15T19:36:24","modified_gmt":"2021-11-15T18:36:24","slug":"715-miliardi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2015\/09\/07\/715-miliardi\/","title":{"rendered":"$ 7,15 miliardi"},"content":{"rendered":"

Dall’attualit\u00e0<\/strong><\/a>:<\/p>\n

The (UN Agencies’) current global humanitarian\u00a0funding budget<\/a> for all countries stands at $19.52bn, but only $7.15bn of that has been raised from international donors.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

Il fallimento non \u00e8 soltanto quello dell’ONU e delle sue agenzie, troppi governi non contribuiscono al budget umanitario e per di pi\u00f9 perseguitano le Ong. Anche\u00a0Action Aid<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>pu\u00f2 intervenire solo dov’\u00e8 ancora tollerata.<\/p>\n

Su Science<\/em>, un articolo di Dennis Normile sulla CGIAR<\/a> illustra bene un secondo problema:<\/p>\n

A key guardian of global food security is looking shaky. Funding for the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), the world’s premier group of agricultural research centers, is sagging in the global economic downturn. Its flagship backer\u2014the World Bank\u2014threatened to pull the plug on its contributions. And now CGIAR is about to undergo internal convulsions: It’s reorganizing for the second time in just 5 years. (…)<\/em>
By the end of 2016, a new board will set a research strategy and approve the next round of collaborative research projects.<\/em>
The board must confront a gloomy financial picture. Contributions are slipping this year to between $975 million and $990 million, Wadsworth says. CGIAR narrowly escaped a bigger hit. The World Bank quietly told officials early this year that it intended to phase out the $50 million in annual support it had provided for years. The bank never publicized its decision or the reasons behind it, \u201cbut everybody in the community knew about it,\u201d says Peter McPherson, president of the Association of Public and Landgrant Universities in Washington, D.C.<\/em><\/p>\n

“Le ragioni sono note”. I finanziatori della Banca Mondiale esigono che tagli le “spese amministrative<\/a>“, tra queste la ricerca agronomica. Non serve pi\u00f9. All’inizio del Doha round, i paesi ricchi hanno affidato alle proprie multinazionali la “sicurezza alimentare” dei paesi poveri…<\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Fonte:\u00a0video<\/a> <\/strong>dell’IRRI<\/p>\n

Cinque anni fa, la fondazione B&M Gates aveva finanziato<\/a> la CGIAR, a certe condizioni. Di ritorno dal Bihar dove \u00e8 in prova il riso “scuba” creato dall’IRRI-CGIAR<\/a>\u00a0(preciso prima che qualcuno immagini un “interesse” per la FuF indiana),\u00a0Bill Gates scrive<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

Farmers in wealthier countries will experience changes too. But they have ways to manage these risks. They can plant drought-tolerant crops, use sophisticated soil analysis to make their land more productive, and protect themselves from losses with crop insurance.<\/em>
The world\u2019s poorest farmers show up for work each day for the most part empty-handed. That\u2019s why of all the people who will suffer from climate change, they are likely to suffer the most.<\/em>
Poor farmers will feel the sting of these changes at the same time the world needs their help to feed a growing population. By 2050, global food demand is expected to increase by 60 percent. Declining harvests would strain the global food system, increasing hunger and eroding the tremendous progress the world has made against poverty over the last half century.<\/em><\/p>\n

Nel 2010 voleva che la CGIAR collaborasse con l’oligopolio delle sementi, ma l’oligopolio non \u00e8 interessato a produrre sementi per clienti senza soldi, rif. l’articolo di Colin Macilwain<\/a> su Nature.<\/em><\/p>\n

*<\/p>\n

Il Pacifico centro-orientale il 3 settembre, come non si era mai visto da quando esistono i satelliti, con un tifone e due uragani in contemporanea, nessuno dovrebbe “atterrare”. Foto NASA<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\u00a0\"\"<\/p>\n

Foto\u00a0NASA<\/a>. Se era a colori sembrava un Van Gogh<\/p>\n

Si parla del caldo record in Europa ai primi di settembre da Jeff Masters<\/a>; delle temperature record di agosto da Nick Stokes<\/a>; dei ghiacci artici da Neven1<\/a>\u00a0e all’NSIDC<\/a>, mentre Tamino si diverte<\/a> con alcune analisi di change point applicate alla popolarit\u00e0 del Trump e altri candidati alle\u00a0primarie repubblicane<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dall’attualit\u00e0: The (UN Agencies’) current global humanitarian\u00a0funding budget for all countries stands at $19.52bn, but only $7.15bn of that has been raised from international donors.\u00a0 Il fallimento non \u00e8 soltanto quello dell’ONU e delle sue agenzie, troppi governi non contribuiscono al budget umanitario e per di pi\u00f9 perseguitano le Ong. Anche\u00a0Action Aid\u00a0pu\u00f2 intervenire solo dov’\u00e8… Continua a leggere $ 7,15 miliardi<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,23,25],"tags":[156,244,731,845,1267,1270,2329,5795,6306],"class_list":["post-28560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-clima","category-non-profit","category-politica","tag-action-aid","tag-aiuti-umanitari","tag-banca-mondiale","tag-bill-gates","tag-cgiar","tag-change-point-analysis","tag-enso","tag-refugees-welcome","tag-sicurezza-alimentare","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28560"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28560\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43674,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28560\/revisions\/43674"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}