{"id":29845,"date":"2016-05-02T14:46:10","date_gmt":"2016-05-02T12:46:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=29845"},"modified":"2021-12-07T18:29:19","modified_gmt":"2021-12-07T17:29:19","slug":"faina-vs-lhc-1-a-0","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2016\/05\/02\/faina-vs-lhc-1-a-0\/","title":{"rendered":"Faina vs LHC 1 a 0"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/bdm.typepad.com\/.a\/6a00d83451957369e2017d426546b9970c-pi\" alt=\"\" \/><br \/>\nIl collisorone di adroni al CERN di Ginevra \u00e8 fermo da venerd\u00ec ore 05.30 per una &#8220;grave perturbazione elettrica&#8221; e la stampa internazionale si <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/news\/sifter\/pop-goes-large-hadron-collider-and-weasel\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">diverte<\/a>. Com&#8217;era successo al <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/2006\/10\/23\/scoperte-2-particelle-e-un-topolino\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Tevatron<\/a> <\/strong>di Chicago per colpa di un altro roditore, una <a href=\"https:\/\/fr.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fouine\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">faina<\/a>\u00a0&#8220;patita di cavi&#8230;\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/indico.cern.ch\/event\/506407\/contributions\/1184968\/attachments\/1265776\/1873815\/LHC_29042016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">ha sabotato l&#8217;acceleratore<\/a>&#8221; ed \u00e8 morta carbonizzata.<\/p>\n<p><em>&#8220;Ce n&#8217;est pas la meilleure semaine pour le LHC!&#8221;, a reconnu l&#8217;organisation dans son rapport. Ce n&#8217;est pas la premi\u00e8re fois qu&#8217;un animal s&#8217;attaque au collisionneur &#8230;<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Nel 2009 infatti, un uccello aveva &#8220;sabotato&#8221; con una\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=1564\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">baguette<\/a>\u00a0l&#8217;installazione elettrica dei settori 7-8 e 8-1.\u00a0Dal <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/indico.cern.ch\/event\/506407\/contributions\/1184968\/attachments\/1265776\/1873815\/LHC_29042016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rapporto di attivit\u00e0<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>uscito venerd\u00ec:<\/p>\n<p><em>Affected all accelerators \u00a0\u2022 Most LHC magnets performed \u201cFast Aborts\u201d \u2022 Main circuits with earth fault, checked and fine \u2022 Several current leads quenched \u2022 Cryo down everywhere \u2022 RF He purge (standard) <\/em><em>short circuit caused by fouine <\/em>(1)<em> on 66kV transformer in point 8&#8230;<\/em><em>\u00a0<\/em><em>Plan for the coming days<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><em>Recovery from the electrical perturbation<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Resume physics<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Buona ripresa a tutti.<br \/>\n(1) in rosso e in francese nel testo. Hanno identificato il mustelide o tirato a indovinare?\u00a0Fouiner vuol dire curiosare, rovistare, cercare qualcosa dai bouquinistes, nelle <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.caritasge.ch\/p107001159.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">brocantes<\/a><\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>e altri mercatini dell&#8217;usato.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">***<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Scienza vs pseudo-scienza 1 a 0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Sul <em>Guardian<\/em>, John Abraham racconta l&#8217;<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/climate-consensus-97-per-cent\/2016\/may\/02\/peabody-coals-contrarian-scientist-witnesses-lose-their-court-case\">epilogo<\/a><\/strong> del processo in cui Peabody, il colosso del carbone ora in <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/peabody-energy-files-for-chapter-11-protection-from-creditors-1460533760\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">bancarotta<\/a><\/strong>, aveva pagato gli esperti Richard Lindzen, Roy Spencer e William Happer per raccontare in tribunale frottole sull&#8217;effetto serra dei gas serra:<\/p>\n<p><em>Perhaps the key findings are best articulated in the judicial conclusions, which begin on page 114. Among the conclusions are:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>22. The Administrative Law Judge concludes that Peabody failed to demonstrate that an equilibrium climate sensitivity of 1 or 1.5\u00b0C is correct.<\/em><br \/>\n<em><span style=\"line-height: 1.5em;\">23. The Administrative Law Judge concludes that the climate sensitivity is reasonably considered to be in the 2-4.5\u00b0C range.<\/span><\/em><br \/>\n<em>47. The Administrative Law Judge concludes that Peabody failed to demonstrate that the relied upon process is neither peer-reviewed nor transparent.<\/em><\/p>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">***<\/p>\n<p>In &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.drcraigwright.net\/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><strong>Jean-Paul Sartre,<\/strong> signing and significance<\/a>&#8221; (2),\u00a0Craig Steven Wright scrive di essere Satoshi Nakamoto, il creatore della block chain e quindi di Bitcoin<a href=\"http:\/\/www.drcraigwright.net\/jean-paul-sartre-signing-significance\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">.<\/a>\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/news\/briefings\/21698061-craig-steven-wright-claims-be-satoshi-nakamoto-bitcoin\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Davvero<\/a>? chiede l&#8217;<em>Economist<\/em>,<\/p>\n<p><em>We interviewed him, reviewed the documents he has provided and talked to bitcoin insiders who have communicated with Mr Nakamoto in the past and who had access to the same information. Our conclusion is that Mr Wright could well be Mr Nakamoto, but that important questions remain. Indeed, it may never be possible to establish beyond reasonable doubt who really created bitcoin. <\/em><\/p>\n<p>(2) Coincidenza, nel profilo che le <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/the-quiet-revolutionary-how-the-co-discovery-of-crispr-explosively-changed-emmanuelle-charpentier-s-life-1.19814\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">dedica <\/a><\/strong>Alison Abbott, Emmanuelle Charpentier cita Sartre anche lei<\/p>\n<p><em>The academic limelight is not a comfortable place for Charpentier, which is why she remains the least well known member of the small international group tipped for the &#8216;CRISPR Nobel&#8217;, if it arrives. \u201cJean-Paul Sartre, the French philosopher, warned that winning prizes turned you into an institution \u2014 I am just trying to keep working and keep my feet on the ground,\u201d she says. She seems to be succeeding, this week publishing a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/nature\/journal\/v532\/n7600\/full\/nature17945.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">paper<\/a><span style=\"font-size: 11.6667px;\">\u00a0<\/span>in\u00a0<\/em>Nature<em>\u00a0that reveals the mechanism of a CRISPR system that might prove even more efficient than CRISPR\u2013Cas9.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Il collisorone di adroni al CERN di Ginevra \u00e8 fermo da venerd\u00ec ore 05.30 per una &#8220;grave perturbazione elettrica&#8221; e la stampa internazionale si diverte. Com&#8217;era successo al Tevatron di Chicago per colpa di un altro roditore, una faina\u00a0&#8220;patita di cavi&#8230;\u00a0ha sabotato l&#8217;acceleratore&#8221; ed \u00e8 morta carbonizzata. &#8220;Ce n&#8217;est pas la meilleure semaine pour le&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2016\/05\/02\/faina-vs-lhc-1-a-0\/\">Continua a leggere <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Faina vs LHC 1 a 0<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2,10,11,16],"tags":[1255,1713,2274,3964],"class_list":["post-29845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-altri-animali","category-clima","category-cronaca","category-fisica","tag-cern","tag-crispr-cas","tag-emmanuelle-charpentier","tag-lhc","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29845"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29845\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44152,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29845\/revisions\/44152"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}