{"id":30109,"date":"2016-06-19T17:57:36","date_gmt":"2016-06-19T15:57:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=30109"},"modified":"2021-12-07T22:01:36","modified_gmt":"2021-12-07T21:01:36","slug":"mentre-smette-di-piovere","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2016\/06\/19\/mentre-smette-di-piovere\/","title":{"rendered":"Mentre smette di piovere"},"content":{"rendered":"

I nomi, i nomi!<\/strong><\/a>
\nOltre ai $10 milioni messi (a suo dire) da Thomas Darden, CEO di Cherokee, $1,5 milioni sono stati investiti nel bollitore nucleare di Andrea Rossi da<\/p>\n

\n

John Mazzarino <\/em>(Cherokee), John Linger <\/em>(Cherokee), JT Vaughn (<\/em>Cherokee), David W. Crane<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>(CEO di NRG, licenziato in dicembre), Craig M. Cogut <\/em>(Pegasus Capital), Jos van der Hyden<\/em> (Hoch Rein<\/a>), Jim Szyperski <\/em>(Power Generation Services<\/a>), Joseph Forbes, Stephen C. Knapp <\/em>(ex CEO di Integrated Solutions, in pensione dal 2015), Christopher Wedding <\/em>(Cherokee), William McDonough <\/em>(consulente Cherokee), John Dewey Weaver <\/em>(Deep River Ventures), Roy W. Mall e J.T. Thompson.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\n

Recursive Fury<\/strong><\/p>\n

JNewman ad Ascoli65, June 19, 2016 at 2:01 pm<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

The endorsement given by the academics to a crazy idea as the Ecat is unparalleled in the history of academic physics, by number, prestige, and role of the people involved and by the duration of this support.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That is simply, utterly and demonstrably false.<\/p>\n

Ascoli65 a JNewman\u00a0June 19, 2016 at 3:37 pm:
\nplease, demonstrate its falsity.
\nTell me which other idea, as crazy as the one that an ugly tinfoiled table top device invented by a controversial philosopher could have produced 12 kW of heat being fed by only one kW of electricity, has been endorsed and supported for years by a dozen of physicists of 3 prestigious and ancient Universities, including some prominent members of those scientific institutions.<\/p>\n

(Nella realt\u00e0 da 6 fisici e chimici, nessuno dei quali prominenti, di due vecchie universit\u00e0 nessuna delle quali Harvard, ma sorvoliamo).<\/p>\n

Ne dimostrano la falsit\u00e0<\/a><\/strong>:<\/p>\n