{"id":30128,"date":"2016-06-25T00:12:31","date_gmt":"2016-06-24T22:12:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=30128"},"modified":"2021-12-07T22:27:45","modified_gmt":"2021-12-07T21:27:45","slug":"os-digest-in-fieri","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2016\/06\/25\/os-digest-in-fieri\/","title":{"rendered":"O's digest – in fieri"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"
\nIl (la?) Brexit <\/a>lascia il resto del mondo “sul pavimento” per dirla con E.K. Hornbeck: l’Economist<\/a>, il Guardian<\/a>, The New Statesman<\/a><\/strong>, gli scienziati sentiti da Nature<\/a>\u00a0e Science<\/a>,\u00a0e Antonello Pasini<\/a>\u00a0e Gavin Schmidt<\/a>; il New York Times<\/a>; The New Yorker<\/a><\/strong>; perfino il China Daily:<\/a><\/p>\n

Once the flag-waving and celebrations die down, Britons are going to be left wondering just what they have left themselves in for.<\/em><\/p>\n

Idem le Ong<\/a><\/strong> e\u00a0non solo in Gran Bretagna.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Gli inglesi<\/a> <\/strong>no, hanno tenuto testa ai nazisti, non avrebbero<\/a><\/strong> creduto alle menzogne<\/a><\/strong> di Farage & Co, cos\u00ec come gli americani non crederanno<\/a> <\/strong>a quelle di Donald Trump<\/a><\/strong>, e nessuno crede mai a quelle degli uomini provvidenziali – donne no, per\u00f2 Marine Le Pen vuole essere l’eccezione.<\/span><\/p>\n

26\/6<\/strong> “In fieri”: i link aggiunti sono in grassetto.<\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

Da Nature<\/em>
\n– speciale <\/a>sulla Cina, superpotenza scientifica stando ai numeri<\/a>, ma non in ricerca di base per via delle pressioni politiche, e poi<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0there are lingering questions \u2014 both within China and outside \u2014 about the quality and inventiveness of science coming out of the country.<\/em><\/p>\n

Su Science<\/em>, Robert Scrive che la Cina batte gli Stati Uniti per potenza di\u00a0calcolo<\/a>:<\/p>\n

The Sunway TaihuLight can perform 93 petaflop, or 93 quadrillion calculations, per second\u2014nearly three times the speed of its closest competitor, China’s Tianhe-2 supercomputer, and 2 million times faster than a standard laptop.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Un <\/span>editoriale<\/a> di <\/span>Nature<\/em> chiede che in USA sia autorizzata la ricerca sugli effetti delle armi finanziata con fondi federali,<\/span><\/p>\n

It has been a bloody year in the United States. So far, the country has lost around 6,000 lives to gun violence \u2014 dozens of them in mass shootings in public spaces. The attack that left 49 men and women dead in Orlando, Florida, this month is, by some counts, the 136th mass shooting in the United States just this year.<\/em><\/p>\n

Mourning \u2014 and then moving on \u2014 in the wake of a mass shooting has become a sombre tradition. But after Orlando, a new development emerged. On 14 June, the American Medical Association (AMA) declared gun violence a public-health crisis, and announced that it will apply its considerable lobbying power to pressure Congress to fund research into this violence. It is cause for optimism that a lengthy freeze on federal funding for such research \u2014 particularly at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) \u2014 may soon thaw.<\/em><\/p>\n

su<\/span> Science<\/em> Emily Underwood <\/span>parla<\/a> della legge californiana approvata la settimana scorsa che finanzia – modestamente – $1 milione\/anno per 5 anni – un\u00a0Firearm Violence Research Center.<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
Cont.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/article>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Il (la?) Brexit lascia il resto del mondo “sul pavimento” per dirla con E.K. Hornbeck: l’Economist, il Guardian, The New Statesman, gli scienziati sentiti da Nature\u00a0e Science,\u00a0e Antonello Pasini\u00a0e Gavin Schmidt; il New York Times; The New Yorker; perfino il China Daily: Once the flag-waving and celebrations die down, Britons are going to be left… Continua a leggere O's digest – in fieri<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[1005],"class_list":["post-30128","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politica","tag-brexit","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30128","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30128"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30128\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44251,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30128\/revisions\/44251"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30128"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30128"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30128"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}