![\"\"](\"http:\/\/www.filmreference.com\/images\/sjff_01_img0327.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Fonte.<\/a><\/p>\n Neutrino<\/a>, reduce di un workshop\u00a0all’universit\u00e0 di Chicago, \u00e8 pessimista. Forse i fisici americani sono pi\u00f9 restii a ragionare in termini politici dei climatologi o degli staminalisti, sotto attacco da tempo? A me sembra che la stragrande maggioranza della comunit\u00e0<\/a> scientifica locale<\/a>, U-Chicago <\/a>compresa, abbia scelto la dissidenza.<\/p>\n Riccardo Reitano<\/a> segnala la\u00a0<\/strong>petizione<\/strong>\u00a0<\/a>degli accademici contro il “Muslim ban” (possono firmare <\/a>anche gli stranieri). \u00a0Alcuni firmatari mi dicono di avere dottorandi bloccati all’estero, nonostante un visto regolare e la cittadinanza di un paese europeo. Nel suo lab (Harvard), dice un’amica genetista, il 10% non potrebbe tornare da collaborazioni gi\u00e0 in calendario presso altri lab: rischiano di saltare finanziamenti dell’OMS e del Wellcome Trust, c’\u00e8 “panico in amministrazione”.<\/p>\n Panico giustificato dalla confusione creata dal governo.\u00a0Amy Maxmen<\/a><\/p>\n The US government has offered conflicting interpretations about how the policy applies to people from the seven countries who hold visas that allow them to live, work or study in the United States. The White House now says that people with the permanent-resident visas called green cards will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis if they seek to enter the US.<\/p>\n “Caso per caso” significa che nessuno conosce le regole, cos\u00ec la polizia di frontiera se le inventa e spesso sono illegali.<\/p>\n Scrivono<\/a><\/strong> Lauren Morello e Sara Reardon:<\/p>\n Nature<\/i>\u00a0spoke to more than 20 researchers affected by the new policy, who described their feelings of fear, shock and determination. Some asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation by the US government.<\/p>\n La prima reazione di Gavin Schmidt era stata “This is personal<\/a><\/strong>“. Proprio cos\u00ec. Scientists in the United States aren\u2019t exactly what you would call a political bunch. Many rely on federal grants or positions to do their work, and others simply see their work as being \u201cabove politics.\u201d But now, thanks to signals that the U.S. administration may push back on\u2014or simply ignore\u2014the work of climate scientists and others, some researchers are stepping in to the messy fray and considering a run for office.\u00a0(And you can find out here what motivated\u00a0this fly biologist<\/a>\u00a0to run for U.S. Senate.)<\/p>\n Il biologo<\/a>,<\/strong>\u00a0care socie e cari socie del\u00a0Drosophila melanogaster’<\/em>s Genetics and Neuroscience Fan Club, \u00e8 Michael Eisen<\/a> dell’UC-Berkeley, uno dei fondatori della PLoS (anche suo fratello, se ricordo bene) in sabbatico quest’anno:<\/p>\n On 25 January, he announced he intends to compete for the California Senate seat that has been held for a quarter-century by Dianne Feinstein (D), who has yet to announce whether she will run for re-election in 2018.<\/p>\n Dianne Feinstein, un “falco”, somiglia molto ai conservatori reaganiani emarginati da quando \u00a0il GOP si \u00e8 sottomesso al Tea Party, ha pi\u00f9 di ottant’anni ed \u00e8 probabile che non si ripresenti.\u00a0Michael E. ha un\u00a0blog fermo<\/a> da dicembre e due account<\/a>\u00a0vivaci su twitter<\/a>,<\/p>\n Altre mobilitazioni su\u00a0Scholarly Kitchen<\/a>, che normalmente si occupa di editoria scientifica:<\/p>\n In response to the travel ban,\u00a0a growing number of\u00a0academics and researchers are contemplating boycotting professional meetings in the United States<\/a>.<\/p>\n Boycotts and travel bans are bad enough, but consider these additional facts about the landscape beyond publishers, all of which were gleaned in the last week:<\/p>\n Gag orders on scientists in the US government since the inauguration of President Trump<\/a>\u00a0have added to the overtones of Orwell, fascism, and authoritarianism. Further, the new US president is attempting to set himself up as the sole source of truth while stating he is at war with the free press, which is portrayed as \u201cthe opposition.\u201d Other politicians are joining this authoritarian anthem, with\u00a0Lamar Alexander (R-Texas), the Chair of the House Science Committee, saying there is now a new source for truth<\/a>:<\/p>\n Better to get your news directly from the president. In fact, it might be the only way to get the unvarnished truth.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n This\u00a0totalitarian view of the world, in which a single person becomes the source of facts and evidence, comes from \u2014 it bears repeating \u2014 the Chair of the House Science Committee in the United States.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Fonte. Neutrino, reduce di un workshop\u00a0all’universit\u00e0 di Chicago, \u00e8 pessimista. Forse i fisici americani sono pi\u00f9 restii a ragionare in termini politici dei climatologi o degli staminalisti, sotto attacco da tempo? A me sembra che la stragrande maggioranza della comunit\u00e0 scientifica locale, U-Chicago compresa, abbia scelto la dissidenza. Riccardo Reitano segnala la\u00a0petizione\u00a0degli accademici contro il… Continua a leggere Il professor Smith va a Washington<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[4561,6948],"class_list":["post-31424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politica","tag-mobilitazioni","tag-trump","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31424"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31424\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44673,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31424\/revisions\/44673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nScience Insider,\u00a0<\/em>dal quale ho preso il titolo del post, esprime in modo non ufficiale la posizione dell’AAAS sulle decisioni del governo e aggiorna sulla dissidenza:<\/p>\n\n
\n