{"id":32037,"date":"2017-06-01T18:56:22","date_gmt":"2017-06-01T16:56:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ocasapiens-dweb.blogautore.repubblica.it\/?p=32037"},"modified":"2021-12-19T21:21:20","modified_gmt":"2021-12-19T20:21:20","slug":"e-tre-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2017\/06\/01\/e-tre-2\/","title":{"rendered":"E tre!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Le collaborazioni LIGO e Virgo\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/journals.aps.org\/prl\/abstract\/10.1103\/PhysRevLett.118.221101\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">scrivono<\/a> <\/strong>sulle <em>Physical Review Letters<\/em>:<\/p>\n<h4 style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><strong>GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2<\/strong><\/h4>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">We describe the observation of GW170104, a gravitational-wave signal produced by the coalescence of a pair of stellar-mass black holes. The signal was measured on January 4, 2017 at 10?11:58.6 UTC by the twin advanced detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory during their second observing run, with a network signal-to-noise ratio of 13 and a false alarm rate less than 1 in 70?000 years&#8230;<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Assuming that gravitons are dispersed in vacuum like massive particles, we bound the graviton mass to\u00a0mg?7.7\u00d710?23??eV\/c2. In all cases, we find that GW170104 is consistent with general relativity.<\/p>\n<p>Dal\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ligo.caltech.edu\/page\/press-release-gw170104\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">com. stampa<\/a> di LIGO-Caltech con <strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ligo.caltech.edu\/system\/media_files\/binaries\/375\/original\/black_hole_size_comparison.png?1496264615\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">disegnino <\/a><\/strong>della coalescenza di 2 buchi neri di 32 masse solari + 19 masse solari= 49 masse solari, resto mancia, a circa 3 miliardi di anni luce da qui:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">&#8220;It looks like Einstein was right\u2014even for this new event, which is about two times farther away than our first detection,&#8221; says<strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.news.gatech.edu\/sites\/default\/files\/uploads\/mercury_images\/laura_cadonati_0.jpg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Laura Cadonati<\/a><\/strong> of Georgia Tech and the Deputy Spokesperson of the LSC. &#8220;We can see no deviation from the predictions of general relativity, and this greater distance helps us to make that statement with more confidence.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">***<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In compenso <em>Il<\/em> <em>Giornale <\/em>pubblica\u00a0<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ilgiornale.it\/news\/cronache\/accordo-sul-clima-trump-si-tira-fuori-e-scientificamente-non-1404293.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">una coalescenza<\/a><\/strong> di bigoilismi sul clima e sull&#8217;inquinamento, a firma di Antonino Zichichi. Il finale \u00e8 un condensato:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Chiudiamo ricordando gli errori fatti nell&#8217;illusione di avere capito fenomeni lungi dall&#8217;essere stati scientificamente risolti e prendendo provvedimenti sbagliati.I pi\u00f9 famosi errori fatti sono quelli del Ddt [1] e del buco dell&#8217;ozono.\u00a0La proibizione del Ddt [2] port\u00f2 a un milione di morti all&#8217;anno per malaria. Il buco dell&#8217;ozono non era di natura dinamica ma chimica [3]: una sola molecola di Cfc [4] distrugge 100mila molecole [5] d&#8217;ozono.<\/p>\n<p>1. Il Ddt non \u00e8 <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/apps.who.int\/iris\/bitstream\/10665\/69945\/1\/WHO_HTM_GMP_2011_eng.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">mai stato proibito <\/a><\/strong>per usi sanitari;<br \/>\n2. il buco dell&#8217;ozono \u00e8 di natura sia<strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.atmos.washington.edu\/academics\/classes\/2011Q2\/558\/solomon1999.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">chimica che dinamica<\/a><\/strong>;<br \/>\n3. non \u00e8 causato soltanto dai<strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.epa.gov\/ozone-layer-protection\/ozone-depleting-substances\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Cfc<\/a><\/strong>, ma da altre sostanze e gas climalteranti come\u00a0CH4 e N2O;<br \/>\n4. una molecola di\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/it.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cloro\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">monossido di cloro<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0o di bromo legata o meno a\u00a0fluoro e carbonio&#8230;<br \/>\n5. &#8230; distrugge qualche\u00a0<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.esrl.noaa.gov\/csd\/assessments\/ozone\/2010\/twentyquestions\/Q9.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">migliaio<\/a><\/strong>\u00a0di\u00a0molecole d&#8217;ozono.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le collaborazioni LIGO e Virgo\u00a0scrivono sulle Physical Review Letters: GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2 We describe the observation of GW170104, a gravitational-wave signal produced by the coalescence of a pair of stellar-mass black holes. The signal was measured on January 4, 2017 at 10?11:58.6 UTC by the twin&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/2017\/06\/01\/e-tre-2\/\">Continua a leggere <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">E tre!<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16],"tags":[521,648,3182,3994,5009],"class_list":["post-32037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fisica","tag-antonino-zichichi","tag-astrofisica","tag-gravitoni","tag-ligo","tag-onde-gravitazionali","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32037"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32037\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44925,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32037\/revisions\/44925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archivio.ocasapiens.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}